A Conversation on the Life of the Mind, Part 2

In part 1 of this series we explored what the life of the mind means for those who embrace the historic Christian world-and-life view. This week I continue my conversation with Reasons to Believe editor Maureen Moser on what the Bible has to say about intellectual virtue.

****

104314531Maureen: Last week you mentioned that Christians are “people of the book.” Can you unpack what that means and how it applies to the life of the mind?

Ken: Historic Christianity affirms the view that God reveals himself to us in two ways:  (1) in the book of Nature (general revelation) and (2) in the book of Scripture (special revelation). While nature is only a figurative book (without a spine and pages), it is nevertheless a kind of library or repository of knowledge. Again, because humans are made in the image of God, our mind has been formed to be able to read and interpret both these revelatory books. (In fact, the reading and translating of the biblical text itself led to the spread of literacy wherever Judaism and Christianity spread.)

This “bookish” nature of Christian revelation means that believers are primed to be readers and learners by nature. In fact, being disciples of Jesus Christ carries with it the picture of attentive students listening to the teachings of the Master. Thus, for Christians study and scholarship are a carry over from the very intellectual tradition of the Old Testament with its historic expressions of Judaism.

Maureen: Does Scripture actually mention intellectual traits as virtues for Christians to prize and emulate?

Ken: Yes, the Scriptures teach developing intellectual virtue that is a critically important part of a believer’s overall devotion to God (Matthew 22:37). First, the Old Testament wisdom literature instructs believers to pursue “wisdom, knowledge, and understanding” all of which are rooted in the fear of the Lord (Job 28:28; 34:4; Psalm 111:10; Proverbs 1:7; 9:10). From a biblical perspective, the pursuit of knowledge and truth always has spiritual and moral dimensions. For both believing Jews and Christians, genuine knowledge of life and the world is grounded in the reality of God and in his revealed moral law. In other words, devotion and learning go hand-in-hand—there should be no bifurcation between faith and reason.

Second, the New Testament reveals that discernment, reflection, testing, analysis, and intellectual renewal are part of God’s mandate for believers (Acts 17:11; Romans 12:2; 1 Corinthians 14:29; Colossians 2:8; 1 Thessalonians 5:21). I’m convinced that individual Christians’ witness to the world about the truth of Christianity would be greatly enhanced if nonbeliever perceived followers of Christ as people who love and prize truth. Since truth comes from God, believers ought to handle it, in all of its forms, as something sacred. This means striving to be intellectually informed, careful, and honest.

In part three of this series, we’ll touch upon some practical advice for believers when it comes to pursuing the life of the mind to the glory of God.

 

5 responses to “A Conversation on the Life of the Mind, Part 2

  1. “I’m convinced that individual Christians’ witness to the world about the truth of Christianity would be greatly enhanced if nonbeliever perceived followers of Christ as people who love and prize truth.”

    I can only agree with that and must (somewhat reluctantly, I admit :-) ) confess RTB seems to fulfill rather well this particular criterion.

    I would rather speak of people of the bookS, since the underlying assumption of the unicity of the Bible is demonstrably wrong.
    And I don’t see any reason to limit inspiration to the books contigently accepted within the Canon:

    http://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/on-the-inspiration-of-the-bible-and-other-books-von-der-interpretation-der-bibel-und-anderen-buchern/

    Cheers, Marc.

  2. Marc:

    I have allowed you to leave two messages on my website because you appear to be sincere and respectful. However, it is clear that you are not a doctrinally orthodox Christian and I am and I seriously doubt either our minds will be changed. Moreover with my busy schedule I don’t have the time to carry on an online debate about deep theological and philosophical issues.

    Allow me to make two comments about my brief interaction with you on both my site and on the comments section of Sandra Dimas’ article.

    First, you say you’re interested in honest dialogue but you attempted to critique my theological views on Sandra’s site without bringing it directly to me. I wouldn’t have known about your comments except that Sandra alerted me to your rather dismissive theological claims.

    Second, you appear to have a habit of making bold and definitive claims that in reality only reflect your personal opinions or very liberal theological viewpoints (for example, “conclusively proved,” “demonstrably wrong”). As someone who teaches logic I would advise you that mere claims and opinions prove nothing you need cogent arguments.

    Lastly, please don’t leave any more links back to your web page. You haven’t earned the right to do that. In the future they will be erased.

    Sincerely,

    Kenneth Samples

  3. :)

  4. Pingback: A Conversation on the Life of the Mind, Part 2 | Tomasz Zadarmo

  5. Pingback: A Conversation on the Life of the Mind | Tomasz Zadarmo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s